Monday, November 26, 2007

Biglari's The Lion Fund Raises Stake in Steak n Shake (SNS) to 8.6%


In an amended 13D filing after the close Friday on Steak n Shake (NYSE: SNS), Sardar Biglari's The Lion Fund disclosed they raised their stake in the company to 8.6% (2,446,845 shares). This is up from the 7.3% stake the firm disclosed in a past filing.

Biglari's has been targeting the company, saying they are concerned about the mismanagement by the present board of directors. The firm is nominating Sardar Biglari and Dr. Philip L. Cooley to the company's board of directors.

Biglari's fund has had success in the past targeting restaurant companies. One past success was Friendly Ice Cream (AMEX: FRN), which was acquired at a significant premium to the prices Biglari was involved at.

Labels: , , ,

Monday, September 10, 2007

Biglari's Lion Fund Raises Stake in Steak n Shake (SNS) to 6.7%

In an amended 13D filing on Steak n Shake Co. (NYSE: SNS), Sardar Biglari's Lion Fund disclosed a 6.7% stake (1,913,345 shares) in the company. This is up from the 5.8% stake (1,659,445 shares) the firm disclosed in the original 13D filing in August.

In the August filing, Biglari disclosed a letter to the company nominating Sardar Biglari and Philip L. Cooley for election to the Board of Directors at the Issuer's 2008 annual meeting of shareholders.

Labels: , , ,

Thursday, August 09, 2007

Fool Has Interview with Sadar Biglari

Motley Fool has a great interview with activist/value investor Sardar Biglari. Thanks Geoff for pointing it out.

We've been tracking Biglari and his success at Friendly Ice Cream Corporation (AMEX: FRN). Biglari has also made recent movements in Applebee's (Nasdaq: APPB).

Labels: ,

Wednesday, July 25, 2007

Biglari Calls Applebee's (APPB) Deal Undervalued, Attacks SEC-Chief Turned Activist Breeden

There is an interesting situation developing in Applebee's!

Activist investors Sardar Biglari, Chairman and CEO of The Lion Fund, L.P. and Western Sizzlin, said he intends to vote against the acquisition of Applebee's (Nasdaq: APPB) by IHOP (NYSE: IHP), calling the $25.50 per share offer below the fair value of the Company.
Biglari said, "I believe Applebee's board has made a grave mistake in agreeing to an undervalued bid for the entire company. This arrangement is most alarming because new board members promised to protect shareholders' interests, yet they have not verbalized any opposition to this ill-advised transaction." (NOTE: This looks like an attack on ex-SEC Chief turned activist Richard Breeden, who was awarded two board seats in April)
Biglari's group holds 1,019,000 shares of Applebee's, about 1.4%.
If you remember, Biglari was successful in unlocking value at Friendly Ice Cream (AMEX: FRN), which recently announced a deal to be acquired by affiliates of Sun Capital Partners, Inc. for $15.50 per share.
To make matters even more interesting - activist investor Daniel Loeb's Third Point LLC owns a 7.2% stake in IHOP.
A Copy of Sardar Biglari's Press Release:
Sardar Biglari, Chairman and CEO of The Lion Fund, L.P. and Western Sizzlin Corp. (OTC Bulletin Board: WSZL), announced today that he intends to vote against Applebee's International, Inc. (Nasdaq: APPB) proposed transaction with IHOP Corp. (NYSE: IHP).
Mr. Biglari Issued the Following Statement Explaining Why He Intends to Vote Against the Transaction:

I want to express to you my concerns about the possible sale of Applebee's (" Applebee's" or the "Company") to IHOP Corp. ("IHOP") for $25.50 per share in cash, a price which I believe is below the fair value of the Company. I believe Applebee's board has made a grave mistake in agreeing to an undervalued bid for the entire company. This arrangement is most alarming because new board members promised to protect shareholders' interests, yet they have not verbalized any opposition to this ill-advised transaction.

My assertions appear supported by the market's response to the announcement of the proposed transaction. On July 13, 2007, the business day prior to the announcement of the transaction, IHOP's and Applebee's stocks closed at $56.25 and $24.38, respectively. Since that announcement, IHOP's market value has jumped by approximately 16%, or $153 million, to $65.02 per share as of yesterday's close of business. However, the stock price of Applebee's, the acquiree, enjoyed virtually no premium, nay less than 1%, as of yesterday's close of business. Usually, it's the selling company, not the buying one, whose stock price appreciates substantially. Clearly, the proposed acquisition price does not reflect the fair value of Applebee's stock, and the substantial inherent value of Applebee's is being transferred to IHOP shareholders, as evidenced by the sizable increase in IHOP's market capitalization. In other words, we believe that if Applebee's undertook the same initiatives as IHOP has in mind, the appreciation IHOP recently gained would, at the very minimum, shift to Applebee's.
Incidentally, we like IHOP's plan to convert Applebee's to a nearly pure franchising model. The future of Applebee's resides in its franchisees. The decision to refranchise would yield several long-term strategic advantages. Applebee's should be in the franchising business for the cogent reason that it would achieve higher profit margins, assume less risk, and require very little in capital expenditures -- all strategic moves leading to healthy cash flows and high returns on capital. Unfortunately, if the transaction is approved, IHOP's, not Applebee's, shareholders are going to realize the benefits of transforming the Company into an asset-light firm.
We believe the proposed transaction represents a losing exercise for the shareholders of Applebee's. As shareholders, we are obliged to ask how Applebee's can be sold at a mere 5.2% premium over the share price as of the trading day (February 12, 2007) before the Company announced that it was exploring strategic alternatives.

We think Applebee's shareholders would realize considerably more money if the Company carries out the refranchising strategy as outlined by IHOP rather than permitting the sale to go through at the currently agreed price.

As Chairman and CEO of The Lion Fund, L.P. and Western Sizzlin Corp., I represent 1,019,000 shares of the outstanding common stock of Applebee's ( including shares of common stock underlying over-the-counter American-style call options). Because of our discontent with the proposed transaction, we are currently exploring all of our options. This Press Release is not a proxy solicitation.

SOURCE Western Sizzlin Corp.

Labels: , , , , , , , , ,

Wednesday, March 07, 2007

Friendly Ice Cream (FRN) Higher On News They Hired a Banker For a Possible Sale; Biglari Sits Pretty

Activist target, Friendly Ice Cream Corporation (AMEX: FRN) is higher today after the company said it retained Goldman Sachs to assist the Board of Directors in exploring strategic alternatives to enhance shareholder value, including a possible sale of the company.

Friendly, as those who follow the blog know, is the activist target of Sardar Biglari who is Chairman of the Board of Western Sizzlin OTC: WSZL) and runs hedge fund The Lion Fund, LP.

Biglari, and those that have followed him into the stock, have made a killing. The stock was at $7.75 per share on 08/07/06, the day Biglari filled his original 13D. Today the stock is at $13.32 - a gain of 72%. (Mr. Buffett we have a new candidate to takeover for you).

One would have to assume Mr. Biglari would participate in a auction of the company. We will wait for an update.

Labels: , , ,

Tuesday, March 06, 2007

Biglari Sends New Letter to Friendly Ice Cream (FRN) Shareholders

Sardar Biglari, Chairman of the Board of Western Sizzlin Corporation (OTC: WSZL) and The Lion Fund, LP, issued the following letter to the shareholders of Friendly Ice Cream Corporation (Amex: FRN). Biglari has been battling the company for some time and is seeking two seats on the company's Board of Directors. Link to past posts on the Biglari/FRN

Dear Fellow Shareholder:

I want to share with you our deep concerns about Friendly Ice Cream Corp. as misgoverned by its Chairman Donald Smith and its board of directors. My fellow nominee Philip L. Cooley and I are seeking two seats out of six on the company's board of directors. Now will be your first opportunity as shareholders to vote for candidates not allied with a board that has failed to create value since going public in 1997. After you read this entire letter outlining our philosophy, we urge you to support us. Every vote matters.

Despite Mr. Smith's false allegation that we intend to control the board, we cannot do so because we are seeking only two board seats out of the entire six. Of course, we will reserve the ability to hold the board accountable in the future, and we will not forgo the right to seek further board changes if they are warranted and supported by shareholders. Mr. Smith also disseminates the faulty assumption that the company possesses cash flows to divert. The reality is that since the company's initial public offering in 1997, it, in aggregate, has generated negative cash flows. Naturally, I wish the company were generating positive cash flows. The value of an asset, including Friendly's common stock, is derived from its future cash flows and is referred to as its intrinsic value. This intrinsic value is computed by taking all future cash flows into and out of a business and then discounting the resultant number at an appropriate interest rate. Mr. Smith must cope with our guarantee: Phil and I will strenuously lobby the board to focus on cash flows to increase the intrinsic value of the company. If we can increase intrinsic value per share, the stock price will eventually follow suit.

Capital Structure. Part of the reason Friendly's cash flows have been negative is that the corporation must service an enormous debt, which is akin to a dagger pointed at the heart of the business. With one small bump, we could return to the grim scenario of a few years ago when the company was near insolvency and its stock below $2 per share. I believe the company will become bankrupt if it does not attempt to deliver the balance sheet. Friendly's has paid more than $ 230 million in interest over the past decade and $620 million since 1988, when Mr. Smith took over the company. The debt constrains possibilities for growth and the ability to execute a viable business strategy. In direct contrast, we will champion a disciplined financial structure to increase shareholder wealth.

Currently the enterprise value (total market value of stock plus total debt less cash) of Friendly's is about $300 million. The channeling of free cash flow to reduce debt will result either in stock appreciation (if enterprise value remains constant) or improvement of the value of the stock relative to its price. Historically, capital investments have yielded the company sub-par returns whereas debt reduction locks in a positive return. I would prefer a certain good return over a possibly forlorn anticipation of a great but unknown one.

Strategy. We believe the future of Friendly's lies in its franchisees. The initiative to accelerate refranchising would yield several long-term strategic advantages. By lowering the number of company-owned and operated units, Friendly's could distribute more of its resources to the creation of better products, better quality control, shrewder, more effective marketing practices, more effective franchisee training - all with the objective of becoming a forceful franchisor capable of efficiently enhancing the brand. A franchisee with experience in operating multiple units can more efficaciously manage a profit-producing restaurant than the company can. Presently, Friendly's resources are overburdened and misdirected by the chore of overseeing and managing an excessive number of company-run outlets. Because returns on invested capital are higher from franchising than from ownership, the brand would be better supported by a focused strategy. Simply stated, the company should be in the real estate, franchise, and foodservice business for the very good reason that it would achieve high profit margins, take less risk, and require very little in capital expenditures -- all strategic moves leading to healthy cash flows and high returns on capital. We are persuaded, therefore, that company- operated restaurants would be best run by franchisees. Manifestly, the company not only wastes scarce resources -- namely, time, energy, and money -- on the demands of proprietorship but also winds up less successful than its franchisees. Operating restaurants, as a result, leads to substantially lower profit margins, higher risks (e.g., sensitivity to food costs), a high degree of operating leverage, higher cost of capital, and significant capital expenditures to maintain the business -- all culminating in the generation of poor free cash flow.

Historically, the company has taken a haphazard approach to refranchising without a compensating reduction in debt. Unfortunately, Friendly's has taken a good idea and executed it shoddily because cash generated from refranchising should have been used exclusively to lower debt and improve the capital structure.

Discipline in Capital Allocation and Expenses. That the company has spent over $230 million in capital expenditures since 1997 with a loss to show for its outlay is a demonstrable illustration of poor operational and financial management. The unfit leadership of Chairman Smith has been the prime cause of the corporation's poor performance. A few years ago when the company's performance was deteriorating, Mr. Smith inappropriately and irresponsibly paid for a Learjet instead of following the alternative we would have recommended: reduce debt. Nero may have fiddled while Rome was burning, but at least he did not throw fuel on the fire. If Mr. Smith is obviously behaving so extravagantly, we wonder what other wasteful, self-serving decisions he has made behind the scenes. According to the cockroach theory, there is seldom only one in the kitchen. The private jet symbolizes an ongoing culture, one that doesn't care about its shareholders. An absolute business essential is an ethos with firm self-control involving capital allocation and company expenses. Furthermore, the company must allocate capital only when returns compensate for relevant risks.

Compensation. Friendly's Compensation Committee is composed of Chairman Michael J. Daly, Burton J. Manning, and Perry D. Odak. As stated in the company's proxy statement, "The Compensation Committee annually recommends to the Board of Directors the base salary, incentive compensation and other compensation of the Chairman of the Board, Chief Executive Officer and elected officers of Friendly's." We are disappointed by the Committee's unwise recommendations. To begin with, we find it reprehensible that Mr. Smith, who is Chairman of the Board, receives an additional compensation of $100,000 over and above his director fees. Up to a few years ago, Mr. Smith was rewarded with a salary and bonus of $493,000 during a period in which as he put during a taped meeting: "I don't spend hardly any time at Friendly's anymore. I go in two days a month, I go in to board meetings, I'm available and we talk once or twice a week on the phone, but make no doubt about it -- I really do not run Friendly's anymore" (Wall Street Journal, 6/9/06). We don't understand the rationale behind Mr. Smith's compensation, especially since he admits that he hardly spends any time at the company. His is not only an inappropriate policy but just another marker of a self-interested culture, which sets the wrong tone at the top.

Moreover, the Committee has designed a faulty compensation structure. According to the company's Annual Incentive Plan, "Each year, the Compensation Committee establishes company financial objectives. The financial objectives are based on Friendly's achievement of specified levels of earnings as measured by EBITDA (i.e., earnings before interest, taxes, depreciation and amortization)." There are many unintended consequences to linking bonus to EBITDA. For instance, doing so can encourage the use of leverage (an encouragement the company clearly does not need) to increase EBITDA at any cost without regard to attaining an appropriate return on invested capital. Setting the incentive around EBITDA can lead to poor capital allocation decisions, as evidenced by the company's troubling capital allocation record. Thus, free cash flow generation would be more apropos for bonus eligibility than relying on EBITDA. Furthermore, capital does not come free. Thus, the bonus calculation must be symmetrical. Management must be assessed for incremental capital employed. If incremental investment produces a below- minimum rate, the pain suffered by shareholders must be shared by management. The implication is that no addition to shareholder value results in no bonus. An absolute essential in sensible compensation structure is to align management performance with shareholders' interests.

Two of the directors, Messrs. Daly and Manning, will be up for election at the next annual stockholder meeting. In addition to their inability to create shareholder value since they became directors in 1997, they have failed as Compensation Committee members. As two-thirds of the Compensation Committee, they had the opportunity to think and act rationally. It is imperative to be as sensible about compensation as about capital allocation. It is time to replace Messrs. Daly and Manning.

Corporate Governance. Representation by very significant shareholders is the best way to fill a board, to think about improving the governance of the company, and to produce shareholder wealth. We believe a board of directors should participate in the future of a company by making a substantial financial commitment on the same basis as other shareholders do. Presently, five of the six board members have virtually no stake in the company, while our stock ownership exceeds the aggregate of all six directors. As consequential shareholders on the board, we would be in the preeminent position to think about value creation over the long term.

We would espouse superior corporate governance by promoting ideas that would benefit the true owners of the company, the shareholders, and hold board members responsible for their actions. To start, we believe the company's board election should be held annually. The staggered board entrenches incumbent board members and insulates them from accountability.

We believe that the poison pill, courtesy of the board, is holding back the stock. There is no reason for Mr. Smith to be exempt from swallowing the poison pill, which effectively limits other shareholders from purchasing over 15% of the company. The company also has other anti-takeover prohibitions, such us the caveat against the shareholders calling a special meeting. The current entrenchment scheme must end because it provides board members immunity, not accountability, and in doing so disenfranchises shareholders.

Friendly's Stock Price. Since disclosing our initial position in Friendly's on August 7, 2006, the day our group filed its first 13D, the stock has appreciated by more than 50%. This increment has been achieved during a period in which the company's operating performance has been dismal. We believe the reason for Friendly's strong absolute and relative stock performance is that, despite the lackluster operational performance of the company, the market expects that positive changes are in the offing. Notwithstanding the recent run-up in stock price, we believe the current market value does not reflect the full potential of the company, a potential that can be reached only with changes at the board level.

You might think Mr. Smith, who owns 12.8% of the company, would have his interests aligned with yours. History has proven otherwise. Mr. Smith has used his board control to extract handsome profits for himself. We believe he has viewed Friendly's as his company. Friendly's is not a private firm; therefore, public shareholders' interests should come first. We, as the largest stockholders of the company, promise to protect your interests, and, unlike the incumbents, we will not rubber-stamp Mr. Smith's wishes.

Many of the issues raised in this letter -- from badly designed compensation systems to the costly, unneeded use of a private jet -- are symptoms of a broader set of problems. Unaddressed problems will continue to wash away shareholder value. Mr. Smith has been sending the wrong messages to Friendly's employees: that incurring expenses for luxuries like his purchasing a corporate jet is acceptable behavior and a worthwhile expenditure. In contrast, the company would send a positive message if it announced that Mr. Smith's $100,000 remuneration would be terminated. It would strongly signify to all employees that everyone associated with the company must begin scrutinizing company expenses to cut unnecessary overhead, a move which would help rehabilitate the firm's potential for aggrandized profitability.

We encourage you to visit our website, http://www.enhancefriendlys.com, to access articles and court filings that shed light on Mr. Smith's and the board's inappropriate and, in the final analysis, inexcusable behavior. The board has been careless with the company's cash flows and balance sheet as well as insensitive to shareholder value and proper treatment of shareholders. Shareholders have given Mr. Smith and the board plenty of time, that is, a decade, to create shareholder value and to substantiate the merits of any of their so-called canny strategies. Clearly, they have failed. It is time that we join the board and begin creating value for you -- and with a sense of urgency.

We appreciate your support, and we will value your confidence and trust in us as we attempt to rectify the company's problems.

Sincerely,

Sardar Biglari

Labels: , , , ,

Tuesday, December 12, 2006

The Lion Fund Spurns Friendly Ice Cream's (FRN) Offer for One Board Seat

In an amended 13D filing on Friendly Ice Cream Corp. (AMEX: FRN), 14.9% holder The Lion Fund/Sardar Biglari disclosed a letter rejecting the company's recent proposal to offer the firm one seat on the board of directors. The firm had been looking for two seats.

In a letter to the Chairman, Biglari said, "We are disappointed with the actions of the Board of Directors of Friendly Ice Cream Corp. We do not believe the board offer of one board seat encumbered with a number of stipulations and with the obvious objective of diluting our influence is good business, good judgment, or good governance."

Biglari also said, "Friendly's is too important to its shareholders and its community for us not to pursue our two board seats without the handicap of unreasonable restrictions."

A Copy of the Letter:

Dear Don:

We are disappointed with the actions of the Board of Directors of FriendlyIce Cream Corp. We do not believe the board offer of one board seat encumbered with a number of stipulations (see Exhibit A) and with the obvious objective of diluting our influence is good business, good judgment, or good governance.

Subsequent to our acquisition of a large position in Friendly Ice CreamCorp.'s common stock, both its bond and stock prices have risen to a level tha treflects the anticipation of change. Any offer that strips us of our rights wemust reject. The restrictions that the offer would impose on us include:

- An attempt to prevent us from engaging in transactions with shareholders without board approval for a period of three years after serving as directors.

- An attempt to require that for three years after serving as directors we support and vote in favor of future proposals - without knowing what they are - which would destroy our independence.

- An attempt to prevent us from supporting other shareholders in opposition to any matter recommended by the board for three years after serving as directors.

- An attempt to limit us to one board seat, which would hamper our ability to foster intelligent discussion on the board by preventing us from getting a second to our motions.

- An attempt to require our resignation if our ownership is reduced below 10% would subject us to a stipulation that does not apply to any other director.

With the proposed restrictions, we would be marginalized as board members,and shareholders will get more of the same - strategies that have destroyed shareholder wealth. No other director has a financial stake in the company as significant as ours, and all have failed thus far in their capacity as stewards of shareholders' capital.

As the largest stockholder, we are not being unreasonable to ask for a minority position on the board, namely two board seats. It is also most unfortunate that the current board would rather cost shareholders more money to fight a proxy battle that we are confident of winning, than having our two nominees on the board. I make that statement not to impress you but rather toimpress upon you that shareholders are voicing their support. Our plan is to help the company, and the cost of this battle, in our judgment, is not as great as the potential losses we all could endure through more board errors of omission and commission.

Dr. Philip L. Cooley - Lion Fund director and Vice Chairman of WesternSizzlin - and I have the experience to serve knowledgeably and judiciously. We would be constructive contributors on the board. Shareholders are intelligent enough to realize that a fresh and sound perspective by financially committed board members is essential after the company's dismal performance under the current board's watch. Friendly's is too important to its shareholders and its community for us not to pursue our two board seats without the handicap of unreasonable restrictions.

We are principled in our pursuit, and we will not waver in our resolve.

Sincerely,

Sardar Biglari

Labels: , ,

Tuesday, December 05, 2006

The Lion Fund Takes Its Case to Shareholders on Friendly Ice Cream (FRN)

In an amended 13D filing on Friendly Ice Cream Corp. (AMEX: FRN), 14.92% holder The Lion Fund/Sardar Biglari disclosed a letter to shareholders discussing their concerns about the company and its current board of directors, as well as the their intention to nominate Mr. Biglari and Dr. Cooley to the board at the next annual meeting of shareholders.

The Lion Fund disclosed the release of the letter in a press release Monday afternoon.

In its letter to shareholders, the firm said, "Our concerns over Friendly's arise from its poor corporate governance, poor operational performance, poor stock performance, and its weak balance sheet. They also said, "We are taking the pro-active approach because we believe it is time for change at Friendly's and we see opportunities - set in motion by sound change - to create tremendous value. We believe the company has not achieved its full potential. But to reach that potential requires forward-looking leadership."

The firm also announced the launch of a website www.enhancefriendlys.com to communicate with shareholders on important matters.

A Copy of the Letter:

Dear Fellow Shareholder:

I want to express to you my concerns about Friendly Ice Cream Corp. and itscurrent Board of Directors. I represent a group (composed of The Lion Fund,L.P., Biglari Capital Corp., Western Sizzlin Corp., and Sardar Biglari) thatowns approximately 15% of the outstanding common stock of Friendly's, making usthe largest shareholder of the company. We believe that now is a critical time for Friendly's and that change must be made at the board level. However, ourefforts to discuss representation with the board have been fruitless. We aret herefore appealing to you, the owners of Friendly's.

The optimal avenue to achieve good corporate governance and to envisionwise means to enhance long-term value is to place very significant shareholderson the board to ensure a proper alignment of interests between the board and the shareholders.

Our concerns over Friendly's arise from its poor corporate governance, poor operational performance, poor stock performance, and its weak balance sheet. To illustrate, the company's escalating legal costs directly result from poor judgment on corporate governance issues, which has led to extensive litigation. Good corporate governance contributes to good corporate health. If you are a long-term stockholder, you care about the health of the corporation, which cares about all of its constituencies - franchisees, employees, creditors, customers, and shareholders. Good corporate health will support long-term shareholder value creation, the ultimate objective of a company. Friendly's must make better capital allocation decisions and improve its capital structure if it is going to survive and then thrive.

Towards that end, our group intends to nominate Dr. Philip L. Cooley - LionFund director and Western Sizzlin's Vice Chairman - and me for election toFriendly's board at the next annual meeting of shareholders to be held in 2007.We are taking the pro-active approach because we believe it is time for change at Friendly's and we see opportunities - set in motion by sound change - to create tremendous value. We believe the company has not achieved its full potential. But to reach that potential requires forward-looking leadership.

We seek alteration in the composition of the Board of Directors to provide greater presence of directors who are autonomous and who therefore are able to represent the best interests of all stockholders. As directors, Phil and I would be technically and psychologically independent.

Over the coming months we will be communicating with you regarding our ideas for Friendly's. Our Web site, www.enhancefriendlys.com, will be the prime source of information that we will communicate to you on important matters. Our guideline is to tell you the facts that we would want to know if our roles were reversed. We are applying this principle in our communications with you now and will apply no lower standard when we serve as stewards of your capital in our role as board members. Shareholders are entitled to no lesser standards and consideration; all shareholders of Friendly's should be treated equally. We encourage shareholders to visit our Web site regularly and to share their thoughts with us about Friendly's.

We look forward to serving your best interests.

Sincerely,

Sardar Biglari

Labels: , ,